Rice Lake Online | Rice Lake, WI

Home | Events Calendar | Sports | Education | Government | Subscribe | Business Links | Jobs | Community Links | Contact Us
Top StoriesObituariesFamily TiesPhotosClassifiedsPlace AdSubmitCouponsDisplay AdsSpecial SectionsExtras
Site Sponsors
 •  Norske Nook

Advanced Search
search sponsored by



Subscription Login
LOGIN | SUBSCRIBE

Top Stories
Obituaries
Classifieds
Jobs
Family Ties
Sports
Government
Opinions
• Opinions
• Your Opinions
• Our Editorials
• Submit an opinion
The Arts
Outdoors
Education
Special Sections
Submit
Place Ad
Coupons
E-Editions






home : opinions : your opinions October 20, 2014


WITC

5/26/2014 8:39:00 AM
Marriage views not that different
Brian D. Rude, Rice Lake


I've been a Republican for the past year or so, and so was much interested in Barrie Johnson's letter in last week's Chronotype. He is obviously a Democrat. He puts Republicans together with Islam and Christianity as anti-women.
I certainly think everyone should be aware that there are extremist elements in Islam that pose a danger to us, but all the Democrats I know are quick to point out that we should be very careful not to paint all Islamists as anti-women and dangerous. I agree with my Democratic friends totally on that.
I am not really a Christian, but I come from a Christian culture. I understand that the words and actions of a few Christian groups, including the Catholic church, seem anti-women. But again I join my Democratic friends in in believing that we should be careful not to paint all Christians as anti-women. And I join my Democratic friends in believing that religion is not a bad thing, in spite of the bad actions of a few zealots.
I understand how Johnson can argue that Christianity is anti-women at its origin, but I think it is inaccurate and unfair to suggest that Christians today are tied to some anti-women sentiments of two thousand years ago.
 I think it is fair to say that Democrats and Republicans do have slightly different views of marriage. In the "Julia" cartoon of 2 years ago, Julia was portrayed as an intelligent and capable person, but marriage was not portrayed as part of her life. I don't think that is typical of Democrats in general. Marriage and family seem to be very important to the Democrats I know. But I think the lack of marriage in the Julia cartoon does say something about a slightly different view of marriage by Democrats and Republicans.
 Democrats probably think they are more pro-feminist than Republicans. Pre-Clinton I can see how that could be argued. But post-Clinton? That needs some explaining.





Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


 





Local Coupons
LifeENL SignupFacebookCommunity CalendarChronotype Advertising Rates
Powered by 72dpi

Copyright© Chronotype Publishing • 28 S. Main Street, Rice Lake, WI 54868 • 715 234-2121 • For news: newsroom@chronotype.com • For advertising: bdorrance@chronotype.com • For site admin.: publish1@chronotype.com
Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved