Rice Lake Online | Rice Lake, WI

Home | Events Calendar | Sports | Education | Government | Subscribe | Business Links | Jobs | Community Links | Contact Us
Top StoriesObituariesFamily TiesPhotosClassifiedsPlace AdSubmitCouponsDisplay AdsSpecial SectionsExtras
Site Sponsors
 •  Norske Nook

Advanced Search
search sponsored by



Subscription Login
LOGIN | SUBSCRIBE

Top Stories
Obituaries
Classifieds
Jobs
Family Ties
Sports
Government
Opinions
• Opinions
• Your Opinions
• Our Editorials
• Submit an opinion
The Arts
Outdoors
Education
Special Sections
Submit
Place Ad
Coupons
E-Editions






home : opinions : your opinions August 1, 2014


WITC

11/20/2013 1:26:00 PM
Bear Lake report was inaccurate
Larry Mofle, Bear Lake


Tyler Gruetzmacher's Nov. 4 report to the Barron County Property Committee, summarized in the Nov. 13, 2013 Chronotype article, "Report finds Bear Lake levels OK" is inaccurate and far from complete. 
In order for the members of the Property Committee to be brought up to date on the Bear Lake level controversy, their names will be added to the ever-expanding email group that continues to debate the issue before the Secretary of the DNR and the DNR Board.  A more thorough rebuttal of Tyler's report will be presented to that group.  To date, Tyler and Dan Harrington's tandem responses to recent public testimony concerning the detrimental effects of extreme low lake levels on Bear Lake's ecosystem and docking capabilities would indicate that eventually the controversy will go to a public hearing. 
 While most advocates for Bear Lake know the levels of Bear Lake are being intentionally held at low levels, what the advocates don't know is the rationale for the intentional low target levels.
Why is the lake being kept low?  Tyler states that the two documents mentioned in his report "confirm the targeted goal that we have been using."  Words like "around" and "approximately" are not confirmations and provide no rationale or justification for intentionally lowering the level of a lake.  However, the documents did confirm the 1915 court-ordered 2-foot navigation allowance which would provide more water depth at the docks of those Bear Lake residents having navigation difficulties. 
Tyler's report did confirm that in 2002 the "Vee" opening configuration replaced a straight board configuration in the Haugen dam.  By design, the "Vee" opening lowered the level of Bear Lake 9 inches below the 1963 to 2000 DNR survey average lake level.  (In 2006 the level was at least 11 inches low)  Tyler and Dan insist that the constant low levels since the inception of the "Vee" are the result of "a drought of historic proportions" and support their assertions by comparing Bear Lake, a dammed lake with constant flow, to seepage lakes, Beaver Dam and Shell Lake.
 Tyler's statement (Dan's also), "Achieving a static level for Bear Lake is difficult if not impossible for three reasons" is another DNR/Barron County smoke and mirrors fabrication.  A 1993 U.S. Geological Survey of Bear Lake determined the size of Bear Lake's watershed to be 47.6 square miles, 70% of which is wetlands/woodlands.  The drainage area/lake size ratio of 22:1 is considered to be excessively high.  The two 6' openings in the Haugen dam would be about the same width of a naturally shallow Bear Creek prior to the late 1880's Knapp, Stout & Co. capitalistic logging venture.  Maintained properly the two openings could deliver the same static level as occurred naturally. 
If Barron County and the volunteer dam operator practiced good stewardship by not raising and lowering boards and/or the "Vee" during the summer a relatively constant level could be achieved.
 I think the Property Committee should request another report from Tyler.
-
-
-
-






Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


 





Local Coupons
LifeENL SignupFacebookCommunity CalendarChronotype Advertising Rates
Powered by 72dpi

Copyright© Chronotype Publishing • 28 S. Main Street, Rice Lake, WI 54868 • 715 234-2121 • For news: newsroom@chronotype.com • For advertising: bdorrance@chronotype.com • For site admin.: publish1@chronotype.com
Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved